Arguments conclude in the Ayodhya Case | Highlights

The five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India began day-to-day proceedings on August 6 after mediation proceedings failed to find an amicable solution to the dispute.

Written by October 16, 2019 10:36

New Delhi: The arguments in the Ayodhya case have been concluded and the order have been reserved by the Supreme court. The Ayodhya case was being heard by a Constitution Bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer.

The court is expected to announce a verdict in the 134-year-old title suit before the Chief Justice leaves office on November 17.

Ayodhya Hearing Day 40 | HIGHLIGHTS

# Arguments conclude in the Ayodhya Case , Supreme Court reserves the order

# NBSA issues advisory

# Senior advocate Dr Rajiv Dhavan appearing for one of the Muslim parties in Ayodhya Case in Supreme Court says, Hindu Mahasabha has variations in their submissions in the case.

#Hearing in Ayodhya land case in Supreme Court resumes post lunch.

# All India Babri Masjid Action Committee (AIBMAC) convener Zafaryab Jilani: I have no information on withdrawal of appeal by Sunni Waqf Board.

# Sr Advocate Rajeev Dhavan teared down papers,maps handed over to him

# Sushil Jain went on to say that the revenue records show that Nirmohi Akhara was in possession of the area and it is shown as “Babari Masjid Temple”. “In 1855, Hindus ousted the Muslims from the building. We won the fight. They have to show that they got the possession back. They have shown no evidence. How can they say we only have elementary rights?” Sushil Jain questioned.

“They say since the land has been used for religious purpose as a mosque for time immemorial, it should be accepted as waqf by user. But we ousted them in 1855,” Jain said.

“There are no accounts shown of donations, or maintenance or possession. The only documentation is for grant,” he added.

# Sushil Jain, representing Nirmohi Akhara in the case, said the Muslim side failed to show proof that Babur constructed the mosque at the site of Lord Ram’s birthplace.

“Burden of proof is on them. Look at the documentation shown. Documentation relating to a cash grant of Rs 302 granted as “maafi” to Syed Baqi. Documents relating to village Sehnwa. It’s not related to village Rampur. The building is in Rampur. Documentation is in extremely torn condition, unreadable. The third document relates to the contractor by PWD. According to the High court judgment, these documents have nothing to do with possession or rights over this land,” Jain said.

Ayodhya Ram Temple-Babri Masjid land case: The lawyer of All India Hindu Mahasabha says, with great respect to the Court, I have not disturbed the decorum of the Court.

# CJI Ranjan Gogoi after submissions made by lawyer for All India Hindu Mahasabha in Ayodhya Ram Temple-Babri Masjid land case: If these are the kind of arguments going on, then, we can just get up and walk out.

# Late Baba Abhiram Das had an independent psoition as the priest and this position has been accepted by others also, Jaideep Gupta

# t has been held that idol is a juridical person, worshippers are beneficiary. Baba Abhiram Das was found to be the Shebait of the deity.

# Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi declares that at 5 PM today the hearing in the case will have concluded. “We have already asked all the intervenors to apportion the time accordingly”

# Constitution Bench assembles on Day 40 of the hearing.

# Sunni Waqf board to surrender its claim over the disputed land in light of an agreement reached between a few parties during the mediation proceedings

# Mediators to submit a report before the top court intimating an “agreement” reached between a FEW parties to the Ayodhya dispute during the mediation

FB post of Lawyer MR Shamshad.

Sunni waqf board likely to withdraw their suit — not yet withdrawn

 

The five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India began day-to-day proceedings on August 6 after mediation proceedings failed to find an amicable solution to the dispute.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the top court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties – the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Many Hindus believe the land was the birthplace of Lord Ram and a mosque was built there on the ruins of an ancient temple. The 16th century Babri mosque at the spot was razed in December 1992 by right-wing activists. The destruction of the mosque sparked riots in the country.